<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1299 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173057</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by the assessee, finding that the penalty under Section 271D was not justified due to the genuine and bonafide nature of the transaction, with no tax evasion involved. The Court emphasized the importance of reasonable cause under Section 273B and the need to interpret tax laws in a manner that does not oppress taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:15:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1299 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173057</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by the assessee, finding that the penalty under Section 271D was not justified due to the genuine and bonafide nature of the transaction, with no tax evasion involved. The Court emphasized the importance of reasonable cause under Section 273B and the need to interpret tax laws in a manner that does not oppress taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>