https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173052 Rules under the Ajmer Laws Regulation of 1877, insofar as they required a District Magistrate's permit and vested him with control over fairs, exceeded the rule-making power because the Regulation authorised only measures for watch and ward, conservancy and sanitation, not an uncontrolled discretion to decide whether an activity could be held at all. Those impugned sub-rules were therefore ultra vires and void. A permit refusal based on a blanket policy that only local bodies would be allowed was also invalid, because it was not authorised by the rules or any valid law. The administrative order was quashed. en-us Fri, 03 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 11:45:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173052 Rules under the Ajmer Laws Regulation of 1877, insofar as they required a District Magistrate's permit and vested him with control over fairs, exceeded the rule-making power because the Regulation authorised only measures for watch and ward, conservancy and sanitation, not an uncontrolled discretion to decide whether an activity could be held at all. Those impugned sub-rules were therefore ultra vires and void. A permit refusal based on a blanket policy that only local bodies would be allowed was also invalid, because it was not authorised by the rules or any valid law. The administrative order was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173052