<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer Misinterprets Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act: Inter Corporate Deposits Aren&#039;t Loans or Advances.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24603</link>
    <description>Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - AO failed to appreciate that term ‘deposit’ cannot means ‘loan’ or ‘advance’ - these amounts are in nature of Inter Corporate Deposits (ICD), which has been given one corporate to another corporate and therefore, no loan or advance as contemplated u/s.2(22)(e) - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:47:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer Misinterprets Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act: Inter Corporate Deposits Aren&#039;t Loans or Advances.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24603</link>
      <description>Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - AO failed to appreciate that term ‘deposit’ cannot means ‘loan’ or ‘advance’ - these amounts are in nature of Inter Corporate Deposits (ICD), which has been given one corporate to another corporate and therefore, no loan or advance as contemplated u/s.2(22)(e) - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:47:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>