https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263699 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the job work service was not a taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994, and even if presumed taxable, it fell under the exemption criteria of Notification No. 8/2005-ST. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts regarding payment of service tax by the service provider, as the payment was made upon audit insistence and no show cause notice was issued. Consequently, the denial of Cenvat credit under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was overturned, and relief was granted to the appellant. en-us Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2016 15:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263699 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the job work service was not a taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994, and even if presumed taxable, it fell under the exemption criteria of Notification No. 8/2005-ST. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts regarding payment of service tax by the service provider, as the payment was made upon audit insistence and no show cause notice was issued. Consequently, the denial of Cenvat credit under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was overturned, and relief was granted to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263699