<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 352 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263684</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, ruling that transportation and insurance costs should not be included in the price of goods for excise duty purposes when the insurance policy is taken by the assessee on behalf of the purchaser.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 352 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263684</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, ruling that transportation and insurance costs should not be included in the price of goods for excise duty purposes when the insurance policy is taken by the assessee on behalf of the purchaser.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>