<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 326 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions separately for supply of raw materials and import of products, with the subvention fee set off against any transfer pricing adjustment. The characterization of transactions between the Assessee and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. was clarified, distinguishing between international transactions and those not resulting in tax base erosion in India. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was subject to verification of tax payments by TPL. Comparable companies were excluded based on functional dissimilarity, and recharacterization of services as Clinical Trial Services was remanded for further evidence consideration. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific issues remanded for fresh review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 326 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions separately for supply of raw materials and import of products, with the subvention fee set off against any transfer pricing adjustment. The characterization of transactions between the Assessee and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. was clarified, distinguishing between international transactions and those not resulting in tax base erosion in India. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was subject to verification of tax payments by TPL. Comparable companies were excluded based on functional dissimilarity, and recharacterization of services as Clinical Trial Services was remanded for further evidence consideration. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific issues remanded for fresh review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>