<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 321 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the transfer of assets to the retiring partner was taxable under Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act, despite the Assessee&#039;s arguments. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the orders of the CIT(A) and AO. The judgment clarified that Section 45(4) applies even in cases of firm reconstitution and asset transfers to retiring partners, aiming to prevent loopholes in capital gains taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 321 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the transfer of assets to the retiring partner was taxable under Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act, despite the Assessee&#039;s arguments. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the orders of the CIT(A) and AO. The judgment clarified that Section 45(4) applies even in cases of firm reconstitution and asset transfers to retiring partners, aiming to prevent loopholes in capital gains taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>