<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263650</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent-assessee, emphasizing that the claim made regarding Section 94(7) was in good faith and did not amount to inaccurate particulars or income concealment. The Court found no reason to question the factual findings and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2003-04, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:26:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263650</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent-assessee, emphasizing that the claim made regarding Section 94(7) was in good faith and did not amount to inaccurate particulars or income concealment. The Court found no reason to question the factual findings and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2003-04, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>