<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263649</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of Oracle India Pvt. Ltd. (OIPL) regarding the inclusion of license fees in the assessable value of imported media packs for commercial shipments where the fee was a condition of sale. It held that electronically downloaded software is not subject to customs duty due to the lack of a mechanism under the Customs Act. The tribunal rejected the inclusion of notional license fees in non-commercial transactions and found the extended period of limitation not applicable. It also determined that confiscation and penalties were not justified in OIPL&#039;s case due to a bona fide interpretational issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263649</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of Oracle India Pvt. Ltd. (OIPL) regarding the inclusion of license fees in the assessable value of imported media packs for commercial shipments where the fee was a condition of sale. It held that electronically downloaded software is not subject to customs duty due to the lack of a mechanism under the Customs Act. The tribunal rejected the inclusion of notional license fees in non-commercial transactions and found the extended period of limitation not applicable. It also determined that confiscation and penalties were not justified in OIPL&#039;s case due to a bona fide interpretational issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>