<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 428 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173037</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the Circular dated 11.9.2001, dismissing the petitions. Excess payments made between 7.6.1999 and 11.9.2001 were not to be recovered, while excess payments after 11.9.2001 could be recovered in monthly instalments. Each party was to bear their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 428 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173037</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the Circular dated 11.9.2001, dismissing the petitions. Excess payments made between 7.6.1999 and 11.9.2001 were not to be recovered, while excess payments after 11.9.2001 could be recovered in monthly instalments. Each party was to bear their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>