<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 315 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the rebate claims were admissible on merits. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for verification of the quantum of rebate to be sanctioned to the appellant, with a directive to pass an order within three months. The Tribunal also highlighted the need for consistency in decisions across different jurisdictions and directed a copy of the order to be forwarded to the Chairman of CBEC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 315 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the rebate claims were admissible on merits. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for verification of the quantum of rebate to be sanctioned to the appellant, with a directive to pass an order within three months. The Tribunal also highlighted the need for consistency in decisions across different jurisdictions and directed a copy of the order to be forwarded to the Chairman of CBEC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>