https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173030 Clause 3 of Ordinance No. XIX of 1946 was construed as continuing all immovable property requisitions that were in force when the Defence of India Act, 1939 and the rules made thereunder expired, including requisitions fixed to end on that date. Reading the continuance clause with the definition of "requisitioned land," the provision was held to apply to every property then under requisition until the Ordinance expired. The non obstante clause was treated as clarificatory and not as limiting the plain scope of the enactment. en-us Fri, 14 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 16:46:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173030 Clause 3 of Ordinance No. XIX of 1946 was construed as continuing all immovable property requisitions that were in force when the Defence of India Act, 1939 and the rules made thereunder expired, including requisitions fixed to end on that date. Reading the continuance clause with the definition of "requisitioned land," the provision was held to apply to every property then under requisition until the Ordinance expired. The non obstante clause was treated as clarificatory and not as limiting the plain scope of the enactment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173030