https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173027 Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure barred re-litigation of a common title issue where the trial court had decided that issue on merits and the connected appeals were later dismissed on preliminary grounds, leaving the merits decision intact. Because the earlier decision involved the same parties, the same title issue, and a competent court's final adjudication on the matter directly and substantially in issue, the appellate dismissals were treated as confirming that merits finding. The common issue of title was therefore res judicata and could not be reopened in the later appeal. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 16:32:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173027 Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure barred re-litigation of a common title issue where the trial court had decided that issue on merits and the connected appeals were later dismissed on preliminary grounds, leaving the merits decision intact. Because the earlier decision involved the same parties, the same title issue, and a competent court's final adjudication on the matter directly and substantially in issue, the appellate dismissals were treated as confirming that merits finding. The common issue of title was therefore res judicata and could not be reopened in the later appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173027