https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173026 The Division Bench affirmed the High Court's decision that the Union of India is a necessary party in an Article 226 application challenging an order of removal from service. The Court emphasized that the Union represents the Railway administration, and any decision on the removal would impact the Union as a whole. As the appellant's removal directly affected the Union, it was deemed a necessary party in the case. The appeal was dismissed, with each party ordered to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 16:15:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173026 The Division Bench affirmed the High Court's decision that the Union of India is a necessary party in an Article 226 application challenging an order of removal from service. The Court emphasized that the Union represents the Railway administration, and any decision on the removal would impact the Union as a whole. As the appellant's removal directly affected the Union, it was deemed a necessary party in the case. The appeal was dismissed, with each party ordered to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173026