<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 4 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order-in-original confirming a demand of service tax against the appellants for consulting engineer services rendered. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; argument that their activities were not classified as consulting engineering services, emphasizing that any entity providing such services could be liable for service tax. Citing relevant case laws, the Tribunal affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, concluding that the appellants were indeed liable for service tax on the services provided. The appeals were rejected, and the lower authorities&#039; orders were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 4 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order-in-original confirming a demand of service tax against the appellants for consulting engineer services rendered. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; argument that their activities were not classified as consulting engineering services, emphasizing that any entity providing such services could be liable for service tax. Citing relevant case laws, the Tribunal affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, concluding that the appellants were indeed liable for service tax on the services provided. The appeals were rejected, and the lower authorities&#039; orders were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>