https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173018 A civil contractor had sought compounding of tax liability under the existing scheme and obtained composition at 2% for assessment year 2010-11. A later Government Order dated 30 December 2010 prescribed a 4% composition fee, but the State represented that the Order would operate prospectively and would not apply to applications filed before its commencement. On that basis, the Court treated the Order as inapplicable to the earlier compounding application and found that the immediate cause of action had ceased. The petition was disposed of as infructuous, with liberty preserved to challenge the Government Order in future if occasion arose. en-us Mon, 02 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 14:25:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173018 A civil contractor had sought compounding of tax liability under the existing scheme and obtained composition at 2% for assessment year 2010-11. A later Government Order dated 30 December 2010 prescribed a 4% composition fee, but the State represented that the Order would operate prospectively and would not apply to applications filed before its commencement. On that basis, the Court treated the Order as inapplicable to the earlier compounding application and found that the immediate cause of action had ceased. The petition was disposed of as infructuous, with liberty preserved to challenge the Government Order in future if occasion arose. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 02 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173018