<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 787 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173012</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the learned single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court. The writ petition filed by the respondent was dismissed. However, the Court clarified that any financial benefits already given to the respondent based on the qualification obtained from the course would not be recovered from her. There was no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 787 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173012</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the learned single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court. The writ petition filed by the respondent was dismissed. However, the Court clarified that any financial benefits already given to the respondent based on the qualification obtained from the course would not be recovered from her. There was no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>