https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173011 The Supreme Court upheld the circulars dated 19.5.1995 and 30.3.1989, ruling that they did not violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Court found the restrictions imposed on private dealers and cooperative banks to be reasonable, aimed at preventing malpractices, ensuring genuine sales, and providing proper after-sales service. The judgment emphasized the government's right to select dealers for scheme implementation without infringing on fundamental rights. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision and validating the constitutional validity of the circulars. en-us Fri, 11 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:48:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173011 The Supreme Court upheld the circulars dated 19.5.1995 and 30.3.1989, ruling that they did not violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Court found the restrictions imposed on private dealers and cooperative banks to be reasonable, aimed at preventing malpractices, ensuring genuine sales, and providing proper after-sales service. The judgment emphasized the government's right to select dealers for scheme implementation without infringing on fundamental rights. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision and validating the constitutional validity of the circulars. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173011