<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 980 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173008</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 21 may be initiated where recorded reasons and supporting material show a prima facie belief of escaped assessment, and a writ court will ordinarily not interfere at the approval stage. On the facts noted, the authority relied on material that inter-State sales were made on Form C declarations found to be not genuine and not issued to the assessee; that was sufficient to justify initiation. The assessee&#039;s explanation raised disputed factual questions, which were for the assessing authority to examine in reassessment proceedings rather than in writ jurisdiction. The challenge to the reassessment action therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 980 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173008</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 21 may be initiated where recorded reasons and supporting material show a prima facie belief of escaped assessment, and a writ court will ordinarily not interfere at the approval stage. On the facts noted, the authority relied on material that inter-State sales were made on Form C declarations found to be not genuine and not issued to the assessee; that was sufficient to justify initiation. The assessee&#039;s explanation raised disputed factual questions, which were for the assessing authority to examine in reassessment proceedings rather than in writ jurisdiction. The challenge to the reassessment action therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>