https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173007 Provisional clearance for forest-based units did not create an enforceable right against the State because IPARA acted only as a recommending body and final approval remained subject to government policy, raw material availability, and environmental considerations. Promissory estoppel could not operate absolutely where public interest and sustainable development were implicated, and its application depended on the actual reliance and altered position of each unit. The matter required reconsideration on a fresh factual record, including a credible expert assessment of khair wood availability, before further approvals could be granted. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:27:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173007 Provisional clearance for forest-based units did not create an enforceable right against the State because IPARA acted only as a recommending body and final approval remained subject to government policy, raw material availability, and environmental considerations. Promissory estoppel could not operate absolutely where public interest and sustainable development were implicated, and its application depended on the actual reliance and altered position of each unit. The matter required reconsideration on a fresh factual record, including a credible expert assessment of khair wood availability, before further approvals could be granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173007