<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (7) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173005</link>
    <description>Rule 3 of the Grant-in-aid Code governs recognition and grants for schools through criteria including local need, avoidance of unhealthy competition, management competence, financial stability, prescribed application requirements, and committee scrutiny. The provisions were treated as structured executive instructions rather than vague or arbitrary standards, with governmental appellate review. During an operative Emergency, Article 19 protections were unavailable under Article 358. Refusal of permission may rest on late or non-compliant applications, lack of registration, or inadequate management credentials, while permission to another institution may be supported by demonstrated local demand, experience, and financial soundness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (7) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173005</link>
      <description>Rule 3 of the Grant-in-aid Code governs recognition and grants for schools through criteria including local need, avoidance of unhealthy competition, management competence, financial stability, prescribed application requirements, and committee scrutiny. The provisions were treated as structured executive instructions rather than vague or arbitrary standards, with governmental appellate review. During an operative Emergency, Article 19 protections were unavailable under Article 358. Refusal of permission may rest on late or non-compliant applications, lack of registration, or inadequate management credentials, while permission to another institution may be supported by demonstrated local demand, experience, and financial soundness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>