<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 457 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172998</link>
    <description>A statutory authority may fix disposal price only within the enabling statute, regulations, brochure terms and allotment conditions, and cannot add a new compulsory surcharge through executive office orders. The text explains that the 20% surcharge was outside the original offer and lacked a clear statutory or published basis, making it vulnerable to Article 14 scrutiny for arbitrariness. It also states that current cost cannot be demanded from defaulter registrants by retrospectively enlarging the price formula through office orders, because contractual pricing terms cannot be altered beyond the original scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 457 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172998</link>
      <description>A statutory authority may fix disposal price only within the enabling statute, regulations, brochure terms and allotment conditions, and cannot add a new compulsory surcharge through executive office orders. The text explains that the 20% surcharge was outside the original offer and lacked a clear statutory or published basis, making it vulnerable to Article 14 scrutiny for arbitrariness. It also states that current cost cannot be demanded from defaulter registrants by retrospectively enlarging the price formula through office orders, because contractual pricing terms cannot be altered beyond the original scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>