<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172997</link>
    <description>Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is maintainable for an error apparent on the face of the record where the mistake is manifest and does not require fresh re-hearing; on that basis, the High Court was entitled to correct its earlier order. The amended Madras City Tenants&#039; Protection Act applied to a pending tenant&#039;s claim because the respondent was found to be a Roman Catholic Mission and therefore a religious institution within the amended definition, and the amendment withdrawing tenant protection for such lands took effect before execution of the sale deed. The pending claim was therefore rendered unenforceable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 21:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172997</link>
      <description>Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is maintainable for an error apparent on the face of the record where the mistake is manifest and does not require fresh re-hearing; on that basis, the High Court was entitled to correct its earlier order. The amended Madras City Tenants&#039; Protection Act applied to a pending tenant&#039;s claim because the respondent was found to be a Roman Catholic Mission and therefore a religious institution within the amended definition, and the amendment withdrawing tenant protection for such lands took effect before execution of the sale deed. The pending claim was therefore rendered unenforceable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>