<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 2 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=142</link>
    <description>The tribunal found a prima facie basis to permit adjustment of excess service tax already paid, noting that the relevant rule appears to allow such adjustment. It also observed that the disputed activity may fall outside the scope of Courier Service, which is limited to door-to-door delivery of time-bound documents. On that basis, pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 2 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=142</link>
      <description>The tribunal found a prima facie basis to permit adjustment of excess service tax already paid, noting that the relevant rule appears to allow such adjustment. It also observed that the disputed activity may fall outside the scope of Courier Service, which is limited to door-to-door delivery of time-bound documents. On that basis, pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>