<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 535 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172989</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court recorded that the controversy was covered by its earlier judgment in Mohan and Co., Madras v. Collector, and therefore dismissed the appeal on that basis. The order reflects application of binding precedent without separate reconsideration of the underlying issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 535 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172989</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court recorded that the controversy was covered by its earlier judgment in Mohan and Co., Madras v. Collector, and therefore dismissed the appeal on that basis. The order reflects application of binding precedent without separate reconsideration of the underlying issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>