<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 310 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services provided by the appellants as Business Auxiliary Services under the Finance Act, 1994. It also affirmed the denial of the small scale exemption benefit to the appellants due to their role as agents providing branded services on behalf of the banks. Consequently, the appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 310 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services provided by the appellants as Business Auxiliary Services under the Finance Act, 1994. It also affirmed the denial of the small scale exemption benefit to the appellants due to their role as agents providing branded services on behalf of the banks. Consequently, the appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>