<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 308 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263640</link>
    <description>Reconditioning and restoration of old sugar mill rollers was not covered by Management, Maintenance or Repair Service for the period before 16.05.2005, because the service definition did not then include reconditioning or restoration and the later amendment expressly introduced that activity. The demand for service tax for the earlier period was therefore unsustainable. The extended period of limitation was also unavailable, as the classification dispute had already been considered in prior tribunal decisions and no basis existed to invoke extended limitation on the same issue. Consequently, the service tax demand, interest and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 308 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263640</link>
      <description>Reconditioning and restoration of old sugar mill rollers was not covered by Management, Maintenance or Repair Service for the period before 16.05.2005, because the service definition did not then include reconditioning or restoration and the later amendment expressly introduced that activity. The demand for service tax for the earlier period was therefore unsustainable. The extended period of limitation was also unavailable, as the classification dispute had already been considered in prior tribunal decisions and no basis existed to invoke extended limitation on the same issue. Consequently, the service tax demand, interest and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>