<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 305 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263637</link>
    <description>Section 62 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 barred civil court interference with assessments and proceedings under the Act and also precluded injunctions against actions taken in pursuance of it. A civil suit seeking to restrain sales tax proceedings and to compel acceptance of C-forms was therefore not maintainable, because the dispute fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the taxing authorities. The available statutory remedies before the assessing authority, appellate authority and Tribunal had to be pursued instead of bypassing the tax machinery through a suit for permanent injunction. The suit was held misconceived and an abuse of process, and the appeal was dismissed on maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 07:57:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 305 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263637</link>
      <description>Section 62 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 barred civil court interference with assessments and proceedings under the Act and also precluded injunctions against actions taken in pursuance of it. A civil suit seeking to restrain sales tax proceedings and to compel acceptance of C-forms was therefore not maintainable, because the dispute fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the taxing authorities. The available statutory remedies before the assessing authority, appellate authority and Tribunal had to be pursued instead of bypassing the tax machinery through a suit for permanent injunction. The suit was held misconceived and an abuse of process, and the appeal was dismissed on maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>