<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 296 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263628</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by M/s. Vandevi Texturisers (P) Limited and its CEO were dismissed, with penalties reduced for other appellants based on their individual roles in the clandestine removal and sale of goods. The judgment highlighted the complexities of proving illicit activities and the varying degrees of culpability among the involved parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 296 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263628</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by M/s. Vandevi Texturisers (P) Limited and its CEO were dismissed, with penalties reduced for other appellants based on their individual roles in the clandestine removal and sale of goods. The judgment highlighted the complexities of proving illicit activities and the varying degrees of culpability among the involved parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>