<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 3 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the enhanced penalty imposed for late filing of service tax returns under Section 77 of the Finance Act. The decision was based on the appellant proving a reasonable cause for the delay in filing returns, as allowed under Section 80 of the Finance Act. The Tribunal also recognized the discretionary power of the assessing authority to reduce penalties, as supported by a previous Tribunal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 3 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the enhanced penalty imposed for late filing of service tax returns under Section 77 of the Finance Act. The decision was based on the appellant proving a reasonable cause for the delay in filing returns, as allowed under Section 80 of the Finance Act. The Tribunal also recognized the discretionary power of the assessing authority to reduce penalties, as supported by a previous Tribunal decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>