https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263624 The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by setting aside the order retaining 25% of the goods as security under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized the need for justifying conditions imposed on the release of seized goods, citing legal precedents and the petitioner's compliance with duty payment. The decision highlighted the importance of avoiding arbitrary measures and safeguarding constitutional rights in such cases, ultimately directing the release of the entire consignment pending the writ petition's outcome. en-us Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263624 The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by setting aside the order retaining 25% of the goods as security under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized the need for justifying conditions imposed on the release of seized goods, citing legal precedents and the petitioner's compliance with duty payment. The decision highlighted the importance of avoiding arbitrary measures and safeguarding constitutional rights in such cases, ultimately directing the release of the entire consignment pending the writ petition's outcome. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263624