<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 2 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=136</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Ludhiana&#039;s order. The respondent, not deemed an advertising agency, was not liable to pay service tax for rental charges from displaying advertisements on its site. The appeal was dismissed as the respondent&#039;s activity did not fall under the definition of an &#039;advertising agency&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 2 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=136</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Ludhiana&#039;s order. The respondent, not deemed an advertising agency, was not liable to pay service tax for rental charges from displaying advertisements on its site. The appeal was dismissed as the respondent&#039;s activity did not fall under the definition of an &#039;advertising agency&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>