<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 268 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263600</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2008-09. The penalty was initially upheld by lower authorities due to undisclosed cash deposits in a bank account. However, the ITAT directed the deletion of the penalty on the reduced sum after considering the Assessee&#039;s explanations and evidence. The decision was pronounced on August 7, 2015, at Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 268 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263600</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2008-09. The penalty was initially upheld by lower authorities due to undisclosed cash deposits in a bank account. However, the ITAT directed the deletion of the penalty on the reduced sum after considering the Assessee&#039;s explanations and evidence. The decision was pronounced on August 7, 2015, at Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>