<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 263 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263595</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the reassessment under Section 147. It emphasized the necessity of a direct link between the reasons for reopening assessment and the final assessment, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the lack of evidence of income escapement. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, highlighting the importance of ensuring that additions in reassessment proceedings are pertinent to the grounds for reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 07:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 263 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263595</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the reassessment under Section 147. It emphasized the necessity of a direct link between the reasons for reopening assessment and the final assessment, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the lack of evidence of income escapement. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, highlighting the importance of ensuring that additions in reassessment proceedings are pertinent to the grounds for reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>