<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Petitioners&#039; Request: Can&#039;t Invalidate a Scheme and Seek Its Benefits Simultaneously.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24577</link>
    <description>Validity of Compounding Scheme – Relief to declare compounding scheme to be ultra vires, is not entertainable inasmuch as on one hand petitioners have prayed for declaring scheme to be ultra vires and on other hand they prayed that benefit of scheme be provided to them for part of period - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 16:27:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 16:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Petitioners&#039; Request: Can&#039;t Invalidate a Scheme and Seek Its Benefits Simultaneously.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24577</link>
      <description>Validity of Compounding Scheme – Relief to declare compounding scheme to be ultra vires, is not entertainable inasmuch as on one hand petitioners have prayed for declaring scheme to be ultra vires and on other hand they prayed that benefit of scheme be provided to them for part of period - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 16:27:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>