<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 259 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263591</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the demand for June and September 2006 being set aside due to limitation. However, the demands for November 2006 and September 2007 were upheld, including applicable interest and penalties, in accordance with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 11:11:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 259 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263591</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the demand for June and September 2006 being set aside due to limitation. However, the demands for November 2006 and September 2007 were upheld, including applicable interest and penalties, in accordance with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>