<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 233 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263565</link>
    <description>The High Court held that unexplained income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act cannot be considered for set off against business losses. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the set off of business losses against income assessed under Section 68 was set aside. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that such unexplained income cannot be treated as business income under any head provided under Section 14, thereby disallowing the set off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 233 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263565</link>
      <description>The High Court held that unexplained income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act cannot be considered for set off against business losses. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the set off of business losses against income assessed under Section 68 was set aside. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that such unexplained income cannot be treated as business income under any head provided under Section 14, thereby disallowing the set off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>