<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 232 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263564</link>
    <description>Approval under Section 10(23C)(vi) turns on whether the institution exists solely for educational purposes and not for profit. Incidental surplus does not by itself defeat approval if it is applied wholly and exclusively to the institution&#039;s objects, and the authority must assess the predominant object of the trust or society rather than treating other objects, fee structure, or advertisement expenditure as conclusive proof of profit motive. On that test, refusal of approval on the stated grounds could not be sustained. The impugned order was quashed and the application was directed to be reconsidered afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 11:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 232 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263564</link>
      <description>Approval under Section 10(23C)(vi) turns on whether the institution exists solely for educational purposes and not for profit. Incidental surplus does not by itself defeat approval if it is applied wholly and exclusively to the institution&#039;s objects, and the authority must assess the predominant object of the trust or society rather than treating other objects, fee structure, or advertisement expenditure as conclusive proof of profit motive. On that test, refusal of approval on the stated grounds could not be sustained. The impugned order was quashed and the application was directed to be reconsidered afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>