<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 227 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263559</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the decisions of the CIT(A) and Tribunal in a case concerning the validity of reopening an assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court remanded the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant arguments, particularly regarding the non-deductibility of tax at the source. The judgment stressed the need for a comprehensive review of facts and legal arguments by tax authorities to ensure a fair and well-informed outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 11:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 227 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263559</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the decisions of the CIT(A) and Tribunal in a case concerning the validity of reopening an assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court remanded the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant arguments, particularly regarding the non-deductibility of tax at the source. The judgment stressed the need for a comprehensive review of facts and legal arguments by tax authorities to ensure a fair and well-informed outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>