https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172980 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions filed by commissioned officers of the Army Medical Corps regarding discriminatory treatment in granting antedating benefits. The Court held that the benefits were intended to be granted at the time of appointment, not retrospectively, to maintain fairness in seniority and promotional prospects. It was determined that the choice of date for the revised benefits was not arbitrary and did not violate constitutional provisions on equality. The petitions were dismissed with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 01 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:32:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172980 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions filed by commissioned officers of the Army Medical Corps regarding discriminatory treatment in granting antedating benefits. The Court held that the benefits were intended to be granted at the time of appointment, not retrospectively, to maintain fairness in seniority and promotional prospects. It was determined that the choice of date for the revised benefits was not arbitrary and did not violate constitutional provisions on equality. The petitions were dismissed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172980