<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 774 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172979</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the employer&#039;s decision to deny promotion to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the need to balance seniority and merit in promotion policies, highlighting the employer&#039;s discretion in setting promotion criteria within statutory rules. The Promotion Policy for Officers aimed to rationalize guidelines, considering seniority, qualifications, performance, and interviews to assess merit and suitability for higher positions. The court upheld the policy&#039;s focus on a mix of seniority and merit, ensuring opportunities for advancement in the hierarchy based on various relevant factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 774 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172979</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the employer&#039;s decision to deny promotion to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the need to balance seniority and merit in promotion policies, highlighting the employer&#039;s discretion in setting promotion criteria within statutory rules. The Promotion Policy for Officers aimed to rationalize guidelines, considering seniority, qualifications, performance, and interviews to assess merit and suitability for higher positions. The court upheld the policy&#039;s focus on a mix of seniority and merit, ensuring opportunities for advancement in the hierarchy based on various relevant factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>