https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172970 Grant of selection grade and super-time scale in the Higher Judicial Service fell within the High Court's administrative domain, but interference was justified where the decision was based on untested allegations, an adverse entry without foundation, and non-compliance with the governing rules. The secret letter relied on against the appellant was not supported by reliable material after denial, and the Chief Justice had found the adverse entry unfounded. As Rule 4(B) required adverse remarks to be placed before the Chief Justice before action, reliance on that entry contrary to the rule was impermissible. The rejection of super-time scale was set aside, and monetary benefits with revised pension were directed. en-us Wed, 11 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2015 17:27:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172970 Grant of selection grade and super-time scale in the Higher Judicial Service fell within the High Court's administrative domain, but interference was justified where the decision was based on untested allegations, an adverse entry without foundation, and non-compliance with the governing rules. The secret letter relied on against the appellant was not supported by reliable material after denial, and the Chief Justice had found the adverse entry unfounded. As Rule 4(B) required adverse remarks to be placed before the Chief Justice before action, reliance on that entry contrary to the rule was impermissible. The rejection of super-time scale was set aside, and monetary benefits with revised pension were directed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172970