https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172969 The Supreme Court directed the establishment of an All India Judicial Service with uniform designations and retirement age for judicial officers. It extended the retirement age to 60 years, recommended new pay scales effective from January 1, 1996, and outlined recruitment and promotion criteria. The Court disagreed with sharing financial responsibility for judicial expenses and emphasized increasing judge strength to address case backlogs. It accepted most Shetty Commission recommendations with modifications, including implementation of pay scales from July 1, 2002. Compliance reports were required by September 30, 2002, with clarifications sought only from the Supreme Court. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172969 The Supreme Court directed the establishment of an All India Judicial Service with uniform designations and retirement age for judicial officers. It extended the retirement age to 60 years, recommended new pay scales effective from January 1, 1996, and outlined recruitment and promotion criteria. The Court disagreed with sharing financial responsibility for judicial expenses and emphasized increasing judge strength to address case backlogs. It accepted most Shetty Commission recommendations with modifications, including implementation of pay scales from July 1, 2002. Compliance reports were required by September 30, 2002, with clarifications sought only from the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172969