<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 909 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172965</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court identified a recurring limitation question under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894: whether the time to seek redetermination runs from the award on which the claim is based. It also noted related issues on the effect of dismissal of a Section 18 application and the meaning of an aggrieved person under Section 28-A. The matter was placed before the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders, with notice issued to respondents and the questions recorded for consideration by a larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:21:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 909 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172965</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court identified a recurring limitation question under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894: whether the time to seek redetermination runs from the award on which the claim is based. It also noted related issues on the effect of dismissal of a Section 18 application and the meaning of an aggrieved person under Section 28-A. The matter was placed before the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders, with notice issued to respondents and the questions recorded for consideration by a larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>