<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172963</link>
    <description>Where counsel reports no instructions in the absence of the party, notice to the party is required before proceeding ex parte. In the absence of any showing of negligence or carelessness, and where the party acts promptly on learning of the ex parte decree, fairness and the interests of justice support setting aside the ex parte order and decree. The matter is then restored to the stage at which counsel withdrew, so it can proceed on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172963</link>
      <description>Where counsel reports no instructions in the absence of the party, notice to the party is required before proceeding ex parte. In the absence of any showing of negligence or carelessness, and where the party acts promptly on learning of the ex parte decree, fairness and the interests of justice support setting aside the ex parte order and decree. The matter is then restored to the stage at which counsel withdrew, so it can proceed on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>