<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 942 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172962</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed without affording the assessee a personal hearing was set aside, as the challenge was based on denial of that opportunity. The matter was left open for fresh consideration by the assessing authority, which was permitted to pass a new assessment order after granting personal hearing to the assessee. The operative effect is that procedural fairness was restored through rehearing before a fresh assessment is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 942 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172962</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed without affording the assessee a personal hearing was set aside, as the challenge was based on denial of that opportunity. The matter was left open for fresh consideration by the assessing authority, which was permitted to pass a new assessment order after granting personal hearing to the assessee. The operative effect is that procedural fairness was restored through rehearing before a fresh assessment is made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>