<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1590 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172953</link>
    <description>Seniority under Rule 27(c) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1959 is fixed by the date of the first effective advice, and where more than one candidate is involved, by the order in the advice list. Because the rule is clear and unambiguous, the literal rule of interpretation applies and equity cannot override the statutory mandate. On the stated facts, the appellants received first effective advice earlier than the private respondents, so the respondents&#039; earlier selection did not determine seniority. Seniority was therefore to be assigned to the appellants on the basis of the rule&#039;s express language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:25:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1590 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172953</link>
      <description>Seniority under Rule 27(c) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1959 is fixed by the date of the first effective advice, and where more than one candidate is involved, by the order in the advice list. Because the rule is clear and unambiguous, the literal rule of interpretation applies and equity cannot override the statutory mandate. On the stated facts, the appellants received first effective advice earlier than the private respondents, so the respondents&#039; earlier selection did not determine seniority. Seniority was therefore to be assigned to the appellants on the basis of the rule&#039;s express language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>