https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172946 Amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC may be permitted to determine the real controversy, but it can be refused where the change is belated, causes prejudice, or introduces a fundamentally new and inconsistent case. A proposed amendment seeking to directly challenge the constitutional validity of Sections 58(3) and 58(4) of the Madhya Pradesh Re-organisation Act, 2000 was refused because it would have altered the foundation of the suit and was inconsistent with the original cause of action. The plaintiff was nevertheless left free to raise narrower objections at trial about the manner in which the power was exercised. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172946 Amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC may be permitted to determine the real controversy, but it can be refused where the change is belated, causes prejudice, or introduces a fundamentally new and inconsistent case. A proposed amendment seeking to directly challenge the constitutional validity of Sections 58(3) and 58(4) of the Madhya Pradesh Re-organisation Act, 2000 was refused because it would have altered the foundation of the suit and was inconsistent with the original cause of action. The plaintiff was nevertheless left free to raise narrower objections at trial about the manner in which the power was exercised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172946