https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172944 Order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply per se to writ proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 because Section 141 excludes such proceedings from the ordinary civil procedure framework. Writ jurisdiction remains governed by its own procedural flexibility, and rigid importation of civil rules should not defeat its speedy and efficacious character. However, where the right to sue survives against a deceased respondent, substitution of the legal representatives is still required within a reasonable time; the limitation period for substitution serves as a useful guide, and delay may be condoned on sufficient cause. On the facts, no step was taken for substitution, so the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:02:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172944 Order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply per se to writ proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 because Section 141 excludes such proceedings from the ordinary civil procedure framework. Writ jurisdiction remains governed by its own procedural flexibility, and rigid importation of civil rules should not defeat its speedy and efficacious character. However, where the right to sue survives against a deceased respondent, substitution of the legal representatives is still required within a reasonable time; the limitation period for substitution serves as a useful guide, and delay may be condoned on sufficient cause. On the facts, no step was taken for substitution, so the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172944