<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 4 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122</link>
    <description>Where the service tax levy for the relevant period had been struck down as ultra vires, the corollary obligation to file returns during that period was not operative. Non-filing of returns in those circumstances could not amount to a penal contravention under Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994. The penalty was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with consequential relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 4 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122</link>
      <description>Where the service tax levy for the relevant period had been struck down as ultra vires, the corollary obligation to file returns during that period was not operative. Non-filing of returns in those circumstances could not amount to a penal contravention under Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994. The penalty was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with consequential relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>